From a strictly Tanakh-only perspective, the statement needs careful qualification.
Let’s examine the key ideas using the Hebrew Scriptures alone.
1️⃣ “Man continues to attempt to climb to the heavens”
This idea most clearly echoes the account of the Tower of Babel in Book of Genesis 11.
There humanity says:
“Let us build us a city and a tower, with its top in the heavens…”
In the narrative, YHWH confuses their language and scatters them.
From a Tanakh-only view:
-
The issue was not technology itself.
-
The problem was human pride, unity in rebellion, and desire to “make a name” for themselves (Genesis 11:4).
-
The judgment addressed arrogance and centralized defiance — not innovation as such.
So the principle would be: Human pride invites divine correction, not “progress invites destruction.”
2️⃣ “YaHUaH continues to strike them down”
In the Tanakh, divine judgment occurs when:
-
Israel breaks covenant (see Deuteronomy 28)
-
Nations act violently or arrogantly (Isaiah 10; Jeremiah 50–51)
-
Idolatry and injustice dominate (Amos, Micah, etc.)
However, the Tanakh does not present a pattern of YHWH automatically striking down every human advancement.
For example:
-
Skilled craftsmanship for the Tabernacle is praised (Exodus 31).
-
Wisdom in governance (Solomon) is praised (1 Kings 3–4).
-
Agricultural and architectural development are assumed and normal.
So from a Tanakh-only standpoint, the claim that “God strikes down human advancement” as a general rule would be too broad.
3️⃣ Psalm 106:29 — “They provoked Him with their inventions”
The verse appears in Psalms 106:29.
Context matters.
Psalm 106 recounts Israel’s rebellion in the wilderness, especially:
-
The incident of Baal Peor (Numbers 25)
-
Idolatry
-
Immorality tied to pagan worship
The Hebrew word sometimes translated “inventions” (מַעַלְלֵיהֶם / ma‘alleyhem) more literally means “deeds” or “acts.”
It does not specifically refer to technological innovation.
In context, it refers to sinful actions — particularly idolatrous behavior — not mechanical or scientific creativity.
So using Psalm 106:29 to condemn modern technology would be contextually weak from a Tanakh-only view.
4️⃣ “Nothing new under the sun”
This phrase comes from Ecclesiastes 1:9.
In context, it reflects:
-
The cyclical nature of human experience
-
Repetition of human behavior
-
The vanity (hevel) of earthly pursuits apart from reverence for God
It is philosophical, not technological.
5️⃣ Tanakh Pattern: The Real Issue
From a Tanakh-only theological lens, what consistently brings judgment?
-
Pride (Proverbs 16:18)
-
Idolatry (Exodus 20)
-
Injustice toward the poor (Isaiah 1; Amos 5)
-
Bloodshed and corruption
-
Covenant rebellion
Not inventions in themselves.
The Tanakh portrays YHWH as:
-
Creator who grants wisdom (Proverbs 8)
-
Source of craftsmanship (Exodus 31:3)
-
Giver of agricultural and practical knowledge (Isaiah 28:23–29)
So human creativity is not inherently condemned.
Conclusion — Tanakh Only View
Is the original statement true?
Partially — but oversimplified.
✔ The Tanakh does show that human arrogance and rebellion invite divine judgment.
✖ It does not teach that technological progress or “inventions” themselves provoke YHWH.
✖ Psalm 106:29 is about sinful acts, not scientific innovation.
From a strict Tanakh-only perspective:
The issue is not building upward,
but exalting oneself against God.
The pattern is moral and covenantal — not anti-progress.
