Skip to main content

Posts

Featured

The Paper Pope: Why 2 Timothy 3:16 Proves Nothing to a Torah-Keeper

  From a Torah-only perspective, the Catholic argument using 2 Timothy 3:16 is utterly irrelevant—because Paul's letters carry zero divine authority to begin with. Before we even address the content of the argument, we must settle the foundational issue: The Torah does not recognize Paul, his letters, or the New Testament as Scripture. From a Torah-only view, citing 2 Timothy to refute sola scriptura is like citing the Book of Mormon to refute the Trinity—it assumes the very authority that is in dispute. But let us grant, for the sake of argument, that we are engaging with the Catholic claim on its own terms. Even then, the Catholic argument collapses under the weight of the Torah's own testimony. Here is the Torah-only refutation, point by point. 1. The Catholic Argument Assumes Paul's Letters Are Scripture—The Torah Forbids Adding to Scripture The Torah's prohibition is absolute: Deuteronomy 4:2: "Ye shall not add unto the word which I command you, neither shal...

Latest Posts

The Chair of Pestilence: Why the Papacy Fails Every Test of the Torah

The Kosher Illusion: Why "Rabbinic Approval" and "Biblical Obedience" Are Not the Same Thing

Understanding the Catholics aversion to sola scriptura

Why would Paul deliberately contradict Moses the Law Giver

The Implications of the Biden-Harris DOJ Lawsuit: Protecting Electoral Integrity or Undermining Accountability?

The Impact of Criminal Voting on American Politics

Trump, Musk, and the Future of Federal Spending: A New Era for America?