The claim that Donald Trump "stole" $1.7 billion from the government while serving as president is a sensationalized assertion. Here's a breakdown based on available information:

  • Revenue vs. Theft: The $1.7 billion figure relates to the revenue that flowed through Trump's businesses during his presidency. While this is a substantial amount, describing it as "stolen" from the government is not accurate based on existing reports. This revenue included income from various sources like real estate, golf clubs, hotels, etc., which Trump did not divest from when he became president.
  • Financial Disclosures: Trump's financial disclosures during his presidency indeed showed that his businesses earned significant sums. For instance, a report by CREW (Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington) estimated around $1.6 billion in outside revenue and income during his term. However, this does not mean the money was "stolen" from the government but rather that his businesses continued to operate and generate income, some of which was from government-related activities or foreign entities.
  • Conflicts of Interest: There were numerous discussions and criticisms about potential conflicts of interest due to Trump's refusal to divest from his business interests. For example, there were instances where government agencies or foreign governments spent money at Trump properties, raising ethical questions about the Emoluments Clause of the U.S. Constitution.
  • Investigations and Legal Actions: Various investigations have looked into Trump's business dealings while president, including the House Oversight Committee's report on foreign payments to Trump's businesses. However, no official report or legal action has confirmed the specific accusation of stealing $1.7 billion from the government.
  • Public Perception and Political Rhetoric: The narrative around Trump "stealing" money can often be traced back to political rhetoric or sensational headlines on social media platforms like X. These statements might not always align with the nuanced details of legal and financial realities.

Conclusion: While Trump's businesses did see significant financial flows during his presidency, the characterization of this as "stealing" from the government is not supported by the evidence. The revenue was from business operations, which included some government-related spending, but this does not equate to theft. The term "stolen" is likely used here for dramatic effect rather than as an accurate description of the situation.