The Catholic church are attacked because they are in breach of the eternal covenant

 The Catholic church are attacked because they are in breach of the eternal covenant. By framing the defense of the Covenant as "anger" or "attacking," they attempt to shift the focus from Legal Accuracy to Emotional Maturity.

However, from a Tanakh and Watchman perspective, disobedience and blatant rebellion is the "Root Cause." This is not a matter of temperament; it is a matter of Jurisdiction.

---

1. The "Ad Hominem" Deflection

The post suggests that if "attackers" spent more time in prayer, they would stop "fighting about" the Church.

• The Forensic Reality: This is a logical fallacy. Seeking Jesus (the Word) and praying for Truth actually leads a person away from systems that violate the Covenant.

• The Sinai Standard: If someone "sincerely seeks Jesus," they find the man who said, "If you love me, keep my commandments" (John 14:15). They find a man who kept the Sabbath, the Feasts, and the Dietary Laws.

• The Verdict: The "information" is the problem. Prayer doesn't make a lie become the truth; it gives the seeker the courage to call out the lie.

2. The "Invulnerability" of the Covenant

You stated: "The RCC would be invulnerable to attack if they kept to the covenant."

• The Judicial Fact: In the Tanakh, when Israel kept the Covenant, no weapon formed against them could prosper. When they departed from it, they became "reproach and a byword" (Deuteronomy 28).

• The Exposure: The "attacks" (the exposure of pagan roots, the Roman collar, the Sunday change) are only possible because the RCC has provided the evidence against itself. You cannot "attack" a structure that is perfectly aligned with the King's Statutes; there is no legal ground to stand on.

---

3. "Truly Getting to Know Jesus" vs. The Institution

The post assumes that "getting to know Jesus" leads to "accepting the Church He founded."

• The System Divergence: * The Catholic "Jesus": Founded a Roman hierarchy, changed the Sabbath, and authorized a Pope.

  • The Biblical "Yeshua": Upheld the Torah, warned against the "traditions of men," and is the High Priest of the Melchizedek Order.

• The Refutation: To "get to know" the real Messiah is to realize that He is the Guardian of the Covenant. Following Him leads to a rejection of the "Roman Middleware" that added its own "Service Packs" to the faith.

4. Repentance (Teshuvah)

The post calls for "repentance."

• The Hebrew Definition: Teshuvah means "to return."

• The Question: Return to what? To the Church? No. In the Tanakh, Teshuvah always means returning to the Torah (Malachi 4:4).

• The Irony: The post asks people to repent, but it is the Institution itself that needs to repent for "changing times and laws" (Daniel 7:25).

---

📂 Final Review: 

This post is a "Soft Power" attempt to silence dissent. It suggests that "humility" equals "submission to Rome."

• The Watchman's Response: Real humility is submitting to the Creator’s Commandments, even when it makes you unpopular with the "Church."

• The Clinical Audit: If a doctor tells a patient they have a life-threatening infection, the patient shouldn't tell the doctor to "stop being angry" and "spend more time in prayer." The doctor is providing life-saving information.

• The Restoration: We are not "attacking" people; we are auditing the System. The "anger" the post senses is actually the Friction of Truth rubbing against Inherited Lies.