The statement attributed to a Catholic priest claiming the Devil is afraid of the rosary raises a serious theological problem, not merely a devotional one.
In the Tanakh, ha-Satan is not a rival god or cosmic rebel. He is the accuser, a subordinate agent who operates only within God’s permission (Job 1–2; Zechariah 3). He does not fear prayers, objects, or formulas. He answers to God. The idea that he is “injured” by repeated human recitations has no grounding in the Hebrew Scriptures.
The New Testament portrayal of Satan shifts dramatically—into a quasi-independent enemy who is terrified of specific devotions and rituals. This image develops outside the Tanakh and increasingly through post-biblical tradition, medieval demonology, and later Catholic piety. That alone should give pause.
Appealing to statements allegedly made by demons during exorcisms is also theologically weak. Scripture is explicit that lying spirits exist (1 Kings 22:19–23), and that deception is one of their chief functions. Building doctrine or validating practices based on what a spirit claims during an exorcism is the opposite of biblical discernment.
If God allows deception, it is never to validate false worship—but as judgment upon those who prefer tradition, spectacle, or fear over truth (Isaiah 29:13; Ezekiel 14:9). Repetition itself is never presented in Scripture as spiritually powerful; obedience and covenant faithfulness are.
The Rosary may function psychologically or devotionally within Catholicism, but the claim that it “defeats the devil” by repetition aligns more with incantation logic than with biblical faith. In the Tanakh, God alone rebukes the accuser; humans do not strike him down with formulas.
So the real question is not which devil is being referenced, but which theological framework is being assumed. It is certainly not the Tanakh’s. And once revelation is replaced by spiritual anecdotes and tradition-driven mythology, deception becomes not only possible—but inevitable.
No comments:
Post a Comment