The line in question (John 20:29):
“Blessed are those who have not seen and yet have believed.”
From a pure Tanakh / Karaite perspective, this statement is not just unsupported — it directly contradicts the Torah’s epistemology.
Let’s do the same kind of breakdown as before.
1. In Tanakh, seeing is a prerequisite, not a problem
God repeatedly grounds covenant loyalty in witnessed reality:
“You have been shown, that you might know that YHWH is God” (Deut 4:35)
“Your eyes have seen all the great acts of YHWH” (Deut 11:7)
“This day your eyes see” (Deut 29:2–4)
Karaite principle:
God reveals Himself so that belief is reasonable, not blind.
Calling belief without seeing “blessed” reverses the Tanakh order.
2. Tanakh never praises belief without evidence
There is not a single place in the Hebrew Bible where God blesses someone for believing without seeing.
Instead:
Signs are given (Exod 4)
Proof is demanded (Deut 18)
Outcomes matter (Jer 28)
Even Abraham:
Sees fulfillment
Acts on commands
Is tested in history, not in abstraction
3. God expects scrutiny, not suspension of judgment
Tanakh explicitly warns against believing unseen claims:
Deut 13: Signs do not validate a false message
Deut 18: Prophets are tested by fulfillment
Isa 41–43: God challenges false gods to prove themselves
From a Karaite lens:
Faith without verification is dangerous, not virtuous.
4. Thomas is not rebuked by Tanakh standards
In John’s story, Thomas demands to see.
But from a Tanakh perspective, Thomas is doing exactly what Torah requires:
Testing testimony
Seeking confirmation
Refusing hearsay
Compare:
Gideon asks for signs → God complies (Judg 6)
Moses asks “Who sent me?” → God gives signs (Exod 3–4)
Tanakh never shames this behavior.
5. “Blessed” in Tanakh is tied to obedience, not credulity
Ashrei (“blessed”) in Tanakh always refers to:
Keeping Torah (Ps 1:1–2)
Walking in commandments (Ps 119:1)
Fearing YHWH through action (Prov 28:14)
Never:
Believing claims without verification
Trusting unseen metaphysical assertions
So the blessing formula itself is misapplied by Tanakh standards.
6. Tanakh faith is responsive, not anticipatory
Biblical faith works like this:
God acts openly
Humans witness
Humans respond in loyalty
NT faith (here) flips the order:
Believe first
Verification optional or discouraged
That reversal has no precedent in Sinai theology.
7. This teaching would fail the Deuteronomy test
Deut 13 principle:
Even if a claim is sincere, miraculous, or emotionally compelling —
if it introduces a new mode of faith not grounded in Torah, it is rejected.
“Blessed are those who believe without seeing” introduces:
A new virtue
A new epistemology
A new religious psychology
From a Karaite view, that alone disqualifies it.
8. Tanakh explicitly links belief failure to not seeing enough, not seeing too much
When Israel fails:
“They did not remember His power, the day they saw” (Ps 78:42)
Problem = forgetting what was seen
Solution = remembrance, not blind belief
So Tanakh diagnosis is the opposite of John 20:29.
9. The philosophical influence is Greek, not Hebrew
This saying reflects:
Greek virtue of trusting unseen realities
Platonic preference for invisible truth
Interior belief over public revelation
Hebrew thought is concrete, historical, and evidentiary.
10. Karaite bottom line
From a Karaite / Tanakh-only standpoint:
God never blesses belief without evidence
Faith without sight is not praised — it is warned against
Torah-based faith is loyalty to what God has revealed openly
Any theology that discourages verification undermines Sinai
In Tanakh terms:
Blessed are those who see what God has done
and therefore obey.
No comments:
Post a Comment