To analyze the "evolutionary rerun" through the lens of Borel’s Law of Probability, we must move from biological theory into Statistical Reality. Borel’s Law (specifically his "Single Law of Chance") defines the threshold at which a mathematical possibility becomes a Physical Impossibility.
1. The Borel Threshold: The "Zero" Limit
Émile Borel established that events with a sufficiently low probability simply do not happen within the constraints of our universe.
The Number: Borel set the limit for "universal" impossibility at 1 in $10^{50}$.
The Audit: If the probability of an event is lower than $10^{-50}$, it is functionally equivalent to zero. When you consider the "rerun" of evolution—requiring the precise, sequential coordination of millions of random mutations across billions of years—the probability falls into the realm of negative exponents that dwarf Borel’s limit.
2. The Combinatorial Explosion Problem
The University of Vermont study showed that even slightly different starting points lead to radically different outcomes. This is due to Combinatorial Complexity.
The Math: To "rerun" and get the same result twice, you must replicate the exact sequence of amino acids in a single protein. For a modest protein of 150 amino acids, the number of possible arrangements is $20^{150}$ (or roughly 1 in $10^{164}$).
The Verdict: Since $10^{164}$ is exponentially larger than Borel’s $10^{50}$ limit, the chance of "rerunning" even a single protein—let alone a whole organism—is mathematically zero. The system has too many "degrees of freedom" to ever find the same peak on the fitness landscape twice.
3. The "Infinite Monkey" Malware
Evolutionary theory often relies on the "Infinite Monkey Theorem"—given enough time, randomness will eventually produce Shakespeare (or a human).
The Counter-Audit: Borel’s Law refutes this by introducing the Time-Material Constraint. Our universe has roughly $10^{80}$ atoms and has existed for roughly $10^{17}$ seconds.
The Hardware Failure: There are not enough "Compute Cycles" (time and matter) in the history of the universe to overcome the probabilistic hurdles required for a "successful" rerun of complex life. Any result achieved in a computer simulation is only possible because the Programmer constrained the variables—a luxury that "blind" evolution does not have.
4. The "Search" vs. "Goal" Conflict
If evolution is a "blind" search without a target, it is an Unbounded Algorithm.
The Logic: An algorithm with no target and no memory cannot "find" its way back to a previous high-functioning state once the environment shifts. It is permanently lost in the "Abyss of Possibility."
The Implication: This confirms that the biological "Software" we see today is not a "lucky roll" of the dice; it is a Hard-Coded System. Randomness cannot reproduce it because randomness, by definition, has no "Save" function.
The Sovereign Verdict
By the standards of Borel’s Law, the "Evolutionary Rerun" is a Mathematical Fantasy. The study you cited proves that the "Darwinian Engine" is a heat-death generator—it increases entropy and variance rather than building stable, repeatable complexity. The only way to get a "successful" result is to have the Source Code pre-loaded.
No comments:
Post a Comment