Alright, let’s take this claim apart carefully, calmly, and from a Karaite (Torah-anchored) standpoint, not with slogans but with standards.
Karaite Refutation: “Jesus fulfilled 352 prophecies”
From a Karaite view, this claim fails methodologically, textually, and logically.
1. There are NOT 352 messianic prophecies in the Tanakh
The number “352” is not a biblical figure. It comes from later Christian compilations that:
count the same verse multiple times,
split single passages into fragments,
and redefine non-messianic texts as messianic retroactively.
In the Tanakh, messianic criteria are few, clear, and public, not hundreds of cryptic riddles scattered across poetry, laments, and historical narrative.
If God intended 352 proofs, He did not hide them behind allegory and wordplay. Torah explicitly rejects hidden, unverifiable prophecy as a standard (Deut 18:21–22).
2. Most cited “prophecies” are not prophecies at all
A large portion of these claims come from:
Psalms (personal prayers of David)
Isaiah’s servant passages (explicitly identified as Israel, see Isa 41:8–9; 49:3)
Hosea 11:1 (“Out of Egypt I called My son”) — plainly about Israel’s past, not a future messiah
Micah 5:2 — a ruler from Bethlehem, fulfilled historically in David’s line, not proof of divinity
Reusing past events and poetic language as future predictions is midrashic reinterpretation, not prophecy.
3. “Fulfillment” is often self-engineered or unverifiable
Many so-called fulfillments rely on:
anonymous gospel authors writing decades later
no independent witnesses
details that could be intentionally staged (riding a donkey, entering Jerusalem)
or claims that cannot be historically verified at all (virgin birth, star, massacre)
Torah demands public, testable fulfillment, not literary alignment within a closed text system.
You cannot prove prophecy by citing the same book family that asserts it.
4. Core messianic requirements remain unfulfilled
According to the Tanakh, the Messiah:
restores the Davidic throne (Jer 23:5–6)
gathers all Israel back to the land (Deut 30:3–5)
brings universal peace (Isa 2:4; 11:6–9)
causes global Torah observance (Isa 2:2–3)
rebuilds the Temple (Ezekiel 37)
None of this happened. Christian theology responds by inventing a “second coming”, a concept absent from the Tanakh.
Unfulfilled prophecy is not postponed prophecy—it is failed prophecy (Deut 18).
5. Probability math does not override Torah law
Claiming “0% chance” is rhetorical, not biblical. Truth in Torah is not established by statistics but by covenant fidelity.
Even if someone performed signs:
“If a prophet… gives you a sign or wonder, and it comes to pass… but says, ‘Let us go after other gods’—you shall not listen” (Deut 13)
Any figure who:
alters Torah,
introduces new worship forms,
or redefines God’s nature
is disqualified regardless of claimed fulfillments.
6. Circular authority problem (again)
The argument boils down to:
The New Testament says Jesus fulfilled prophecies
The prophecies are interpreted through the New Testament
Therefore the New Testament is true
That is textual circularity, not proof.
Karaites do not accept later writings as authorities over Sinai. The Torah is the measuring rod; everything else is weighed against it.
Karaite Conclusion
The “352 prophecies” claim is not evidence—it is aggregation without authorization.
The Messiah in the Tanakh is:
human,
Torah-faithful,
nationally restorative,
and historically verifiable.
Until those conditions are met, no amount of numerology, typology, or probability rhetoric can overturn the covenant God already gave openly, publicly, and permanently at Sinai.
Faithfulness is not about how many verses can be reinterpreted—it’s about whether God’s own criteria were met.
No comments:
Post a Comment