Have AI decoded the Turin shroud

 In recent months, there has been a significant surge in reports about AI "decoding" the Shroud of Turin. However, it is important to distinguish between sensationalized viral content and actual peer-reviewed research.

While there isn't a "secret Morse code" or text discovered in the way some headlines suggest, modern AI and digital analysis have revealed specific mathematical and structural patterns that are sparking a new wave of debate.

1. The "Hidden Code" Claims (Viral vs. Scientific)

Most of the current "code" buzz stems from viral videos and social media posts (many appearing in late 2025) which use the term "code" to describe complex mathematical ratios and 3D data found within the fabric's image.

• Geometric Ratios: AI analysis has identified precise geometric proportions (like the 4:1 length-to-width ratio) that mirror ancient "sacred geometry" often found in 1st-century Middle Eastern architecture.

• 3D Topographic Data: Researchers have long known that the Shroud image contains 3D information (unlike a 2D painting). Recent AI principal-component analysis (PCA) by chemical engineer Tom McAvoy has confirmed that the pixel intensity correlates to the distance from the body, essentially encoding a "depth map" that a 2D artist would struggle to forge.

2. The "Radiation Signature" Theory

The most technical "code" being discussed in 2025 relates to Image Formation.

• Principal Component Analysis (PCA): AI algorithms used to filter out noise from the linen have shown that the image behaves like a collimated radiation burst (light that moves in straight, parallel lines).

• The Binary Fibril Code: At a microscopic level, individual linen fibers are either "on" (oxidized/yellowed) or "off" (unmodified). AI has been used to calculate the statistical probability of this "halftone" effect occurring naturally, concluding it is nearly impossible through standard contact or painting.

3. AI Face Reconstructions

In August 2024 and continuing through 2025, several high-profile AI-generated images of "Jesus" based on the Shroud went viral. While these are visually stunning and provide a "realistic" face of the man in the Shroud, it’s worth noting:

• Subjectivity: The AI is "hallucinating" or filling in gaps based on existing art styles.

• Anomalies: Some AI scans reported seeing "inscriptions" or "letters" near the head, though scientific consensus remains skeptical of these being actual human-written text.

4. Scientific Counter-Audits

Not all AI findings favor authenticity. In August 2025, digital analyst Cicero Moraes used 3D simulations to argue that the image could potentially be formed by a low-relief sculpture (a 3D model) rather than a human body, suggesting a medieval artist could have achieved the 3D encoding through specific artistic techniques.

---

The Sovereign Verdict

There is no "Da Vinci Code" style message written on the cloth. The "code" AI has found is information density. The image acts more like a high-tech data recording than a drawing. Whether you see this as a "holographic record of the Resurrection" or a "masterpiece of medieval physics" depends on your interpretation of the data.