1. Maintaining the Illusion of Infallibility
The core claim of the Church, particularly concerning the Pope and ecumenical Councils, involves a degree of infallibility or divine guidance when defining major dogmas (like the Trinity).
The Deception: If a dogma is acknowledged as a product of human, political, and historical evolution (which your book argues), it compromises the claim of its timeless, divinely delivered truth. Calling it an "inspired synthesis" allows the Church to concede the historical process without conceding the dogma's authority.
Power Hook: It shields the institutional claim that the Church (not merely historical circumstance) was the necessary vessel through which this "synthesis" occurred, thus preserving the power of the Magisterium (teaching authority).
2. The Selective Use of Historical-Critical Method
The Church engages with historical-critical scholarship selectively. It accepts historical facts that reveal the Bible's human development (e.g., different authorship for Isaiah, the evolution of texts) but stops short when those same facts lead to conclusions that dismantle core post-4th-century doctrines.
The Deception: The Church uses the historical method to appear intellectually honest and relevant to scholars, but demands that the final conclusion must always circle back and affirm the traditional dogma (e.g., "Yes, Yahweh evolved, but the synthesis into the Trinity was God's final intent").
Power Hook: This move co-opts the tools of skepticism (scholarship) but subordinates them to the institution's unchanging theological conclusion, effectively neutralizing the intellectual threat while appearing open-minded.
3. Preserving the Coercive Power of Dogma
Dogmas like the Trinity and the nature of Christ are essential because they set the boundary for who is "in" (Orthodox) and who is "out" (Heretic). If these dogmas are merely "inspired syntheses," they lose their absolute, binding authority.
The Deception: By maintaining the dogma's status as revealed truth, the Church retains the right to declare certain beliefs (like Arianism or Gnosticism) as damnable or false, even if history shows those beliefs were valid competitors for centuries.
Power Hook: This enforces a singular, controllable narrative for the gullible layperson, ensuring theological unity and preventing decentralized interpretation which could dissolve the central authority structure.
4. The Fear of Complete Deconstruction
If the Church were truly honest about the human and political origins of its doctrines, it is feared the entire theological edifice would collapse, leading to mass exodus and a total loss of financial and moral capital.
The Deception: The "synthesis" term is a bridge mechanism—it provides just enough intellectual space for Catholic scholars to operate without forcing them to reject their vocation. It prevents the historical facts from being translated into immediate, radical action by the faithful.
Power Hook: The primary concern is not theological elegance, but institutional survival. Maintaining the "sacred story" is required to keep the pews full and the tithing flowing, which is the ultimate basis of secular power.
5. Prioritizing Institutional Authority over Textual Primacy
My book argues that the Church Councils essentially defined the dogmas first, then used their authority to finalize the Biblical Canon to support those dogmas.
The Deception: The modern Church still teaches that the Bible is the primary source that proves the doctrines. However, the scholarly acceptance of "synthesis" means the Church knows the institution (the councils/tradition) actually created the doctrines and the Bible simply affirms them afterward.
Power Hook: This confirms the Catholic teaching that Tradition (the Church's history and authority) is superior to the Bible alone (Sola Scriptura). The "inspired synthesis" is proof that the Church's continuing power to define truth is more important than the historical text itself.
No comments:
Post a Comment