The theory that Adam’s Calendar aligns with Orion’s Belt is the primary argument used to claim the site is tens of thousands of years old. This theory relies on the concept of Archaeoastronomy and the "Orion Correlation Theory," which was popularized by authors like Robert Bauval regarding the Pyramids of Giza.
1. The Mechanics of the Alignment
The theory focuses on three specific stones within the Adam’s Calendar complex. Proponents, most notably Michael Tellinger and Johan Heine, argue that these stones were placed to mirror the three stars of Orion’s Belt (Alnitak, Alnilam, and Alnitak).
The "Tilt" Problem: Because of a phenomenon called Axial Precession (the Earth’s slow "wobble" on its axis), the position of stars in the sky changes over long cycles of about 25,800 years.
The Dating Claim: Proponents argue that the stones do not align with Orion’s Belt as it appears today. However, by using planetarium software to "rewind" the night sky, they claim the stones perfectly match the stars as they appeared 75,000 to 160,000 years ago.
2. The Critical Flaws: Why Science Disagrees
Mainstream astronomers and archaeologists highlight several significant issues with this dating method:
The "Best Fit" Fallacy: Skeptics argue that with thousands of stones scattered across the Mpumalanga landscape, one can almost always find three stones that "align" with a prominent constellation if you rewind the clock far enough.
Geological Movement: Over 75,000 years, the Earth’s crust undergoes subtle shifts, erosion, and soil movement. Critics argue it is geologically impossible for standing stones to remain in precise "millimeter-perfect" alignment over such a vast period without falling or shifting.
The Latitude Issue: Some astronomers point out that the specific angle of the stones at Adam’s Calendar doesn't match the rise of Orion at that specific latitude during the claimed timeframe as accurately as suggested.
3. The "Sun" Alignment vs. "Star" Alignment
While the Orion theory is the most famous "fringe" claim, there is a more grounded astronomical observation regarding the Solstices:
The Calendar Function: Two of the large upright stones (the "monoliths") are positioned such that they cast a specific shadow during the Summer and Winter Solstices.
Practical Use: This would have been highly valuable for the Bakoni farmers. Knowing exactly when the seasons were turning allowed for precise timing of crop planting and cattle migration.
4. Summary: Archetypal vs. Historical
The Orion alignment theory often moves away from "hard archaeology" and into the realm of Sacred Geometry. Proponents believe the site was a "temple of the sun" where the layout was intended to harmonize the Earth with the Heavens.
| Theory Type | Focus | Claimed Date |
| Orion Correlation | Three stones match Orion's Belt | 75,000+ BCE |
| Solar Tracking | Shadow markers for Solstices | 1500–1800 CE |
| Bakoni Farming | Livestock management | 1600s CE |
No comments:
Post a Comment